Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Hannah Webster Foster: The Coquette (Main Blog-Lacy Rowan)

Hannah Webster Foster (1758-1840) was an important novelist of the 18th century. The Coquette (one of her better known works) was written published in 1797 and was based loosely on fact. The main character of the novel is Eliza Wharton, who is based on Elizabeth Whitman, a well respected woman from Hartford Connecticut. Elizabeth's story became a warning to young girls and boys when she rejected potential suitors and ended up being seduced by  a man who left her after he found out she was pregnant. She delivered a stillborn child and died later from complications from her pregnancy. While no one knows the real identity of her real-life seducer, she became a cautionary tale for young adults at the time; a warning to think rationally rather than getting swept up in passion. 
The story of Eliza Wharton starts after her fiancĂ© passes away. She was engaged to a man named Mr. Haly who dies before they could ever marry. She moves to New Haven in search of a fresh start. She was fond of Mr. Haly, but was secretly happy to be free from the ties of marriage. She did not want to marry him because she did not love him, but he was a nice man and she was willing to make that sacrifice. In New Haven, she lives a carefree, lavish life with servants, walks in the garden, and dance parties. She meets a man named J. Boyer, who seems like a potential suitor. He seems to be quite fond of Eliza, is going to be a reverend, is educated and comes from  a wealthy family. Boyer is a gentleman and soon becomes close to Eliza. She also meets a man named Peter Sanford. Sanford is a bachelor. He is known in town for having a somewhat bad reputation. He seduces women, has no job, and is certainly someone to be wary of. He became infatuated with Eliza, who is incredibly susceptible to his charms. Sanford views Eliza as "Thoughtless of everything but present enjoyment" (826). He intends on avenging man everywhere who have been seduced by a coquette, and intends to destroy her reputation. Over time, he realizes that though she may be vapid, she is a kind and fun person and calls off his plans. 
Some time passes, and Eliza and Boyer are dating. Boyer wishes to marry Eliza. Eliza says she is interested but cannot commit yet. She says that she will give him a decision in due time. After a while, Boyer begins to grow impatient waiting for an answer but respects her wishes. Before ever giving an answer, Eliza is found talking with Sanford in the garden by Boyer, who then breaks off the relationship, but continues to write her as a friend. Over time, Eliza slips into a deep depression. Sanford is married to a woman of wealth whom he does not love. He says that he would have married Eliza if the situation were different, but simultaneously doesn't want her to marry another. Sanford doesn't truly love Eliza. He likes the thrill of the chase and if he were to have Eliza, he would probably grow tired of her soon after. She regrets not marring Boyer (who is now married) when she had the chance, as she is now alone. She lives with her mother before Sanford suddenly reenters her life and takes her away with him where she died at age 37 from her complications from the stillborn child delivered sometime earlier.  
The writing itself gives great insight to what life was like for young women of the time and the expectations society held for them. Women were expected to marry a man who was most likely picked out by your parents (also typically of wealth or higher class), settle down, have children and maintain the house. Eliza was not interested in this. She wanted to settle down eventually, but wanted to wait until she found the right man. She resented the fact that married women tend to forget about their friends and did not wish to become this way. She very much valued her independence and in today's society, she could have been considered an old fashioned woman. Where at the time, she was relatively scandalous. It just goes to show the change in cultures over time. She exemplifies a young woman who is "rebelling" against the norm. She continues to go after what she wants even though she is aware that the society she is a part of views her as a "coquette" for doing so. The Coquette shows how women found it difficult to obtain equality in any matter; psychologically, socially, or financially. They were told what to do, controlled, and looked down upon if they did not go along the traditional path. It also shows the economic barriers that were involved in marriage at the time; people often sacrificed love in search of fortune. Overall, Eliza's character shows life as a young twentysomething woman in the 18th century. Her story does not have a happy ending but the writing about her (or Elizabeth, rather) is a reminder of how far we have come with gender equality, and how far we have yet to go. 

4 comments:

  1. Hi Lacy,

    I absolutely loved reading about Eliza Wharton’s life and her exciting adventures! I think you did a very good job explaining the plot and analyzing why Eliza made the decisions that she made. I love how you brought up the idea of gender equality and compared it to how women were supposed to act in the past. She is a courageous, brave, and creative young women that wanted to find true love.
    I agree with the fact that the author wrote this story for a reason. It is a warning to women that want to find true love. She warns them not to act on the heart but to think things through and to make wise decisions. Something that I found interesting was that the author, Hannah Webster Foster, wrote this colorful story through letters. I sat down and thought to myself, why would the author do this? The entire story is about Eliza Wharton wanting to be free and adventurous, but is constantly being judged for the decisions that she makes. She is constantly being watched and told what to do by the people around her. They tell her that she should find a good man who has righteous morals, settle down and do everything that one expects from a wife. So by writing this story through letters, the author is showing how people see her. Lucy, Mr. Stanford, Mr. Boyer, Eliza’s mother each get a chance to explain what they think of Eliza in each of these letters.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not only think that this novel gave insight into what it was like to be a woman at the time this novel was written, it seems to be a warning for young woman of the day. Foster loosely bases this novel on the well-known life story of Elizabeth Whitman. Foster uses Eliza’s free spirit esc nature to show young women what not to do. Despite advice from Lucy, Eliza continues to associate herself with Major Sanford. Soon Boyer realizes Eliza is not worth the wait especially since she chose to spend so much of her time with Sanford. After Boyer makes it clear his intent is no longer to be with Eliza she becomes distraught at the fact that she has no real options. This part in the novel is where I think the authors intent becomes evident. Because of Eliza’s previous chooses and her flirtatious demeaner lost her chance for a perfectly good suitor. While she was looking for the perfect man she let her best option for a husband. Not that Eliza’s death and outcast from society is only her fault, though her priorities were not what they should have been for a woman her time.
    Eliza is just one of many to blame for what happened to her. Her parents, for starters, who have an obligation to instill in side her a strong sense of what a woman of their social status ought to be doing. When it was time for Eliza to start looking for another possible husband her mom didn’t seem to have as much authority in the subject as she probably should have. After becoming aware of Stanford’s reputation Mrs. Wharton does little to defuse the situation, she too did not do what society demanded of her and that was a factor in Eliza’s mistakes. The most obvious person to blame for this affair, other than Eliza, is Major Sanford who aggressively pursued Eliza with only his best interest at heart. His goal was to break Boyer and Eliza apart but offered her no alternative for marriage. His mindset was “if I can’t her nobody can”. Eliza was not in the financial state that Stanford needed in a wife. He ended up married to a wealthy woman and in so many words told her he only married her for her wealth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your analysis of The Coquette was wonderful. I love how you made the connection of Hannah Webster Foster paralleling this book to the life of Elizabeth Whitman. I don’t remember making that connection, myself, in the studies of this text and it was great to now know that things like this happened in real life to someone in that era for this cautionary book to come to be. I also love the details you put into explaining the events of the book and the many awful things that Eliza went through. It just wouldn’t be the same to put the plot and events of the book and squish them into a measly two or three sentence because it doesn’t have the same affect.
    I don’t think I found any flaws in your post about The Coquette. I love how into detail you went when analyzing it, which leaves little room for error or misinterpretation. You also did a very good job of including every important moment of the novella which helped to not leave holes in your description and interpretation of the plot line and events. It is very organized and flows well from paragraph to paragraph without holes for misunderstanding. I don’t think I could have done a better job at the analysis and description of this text.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Lacy,

    I really enjoyed your analysis of The Coquette. It was very well written. I really liked how in depth you went in describing each character and how they affected Eliza's life in a short and descriptive manner. I liked how the novel gave an insight into the life of women in this time period. I also enjoyed how it showed how the marriage processes worked in this time period. I think your analysis is so good. I really like how well you tell the story and make it flow.

    ReplyDelete